Header Ads

Article: Many wives, many powers in Africa?

SOSIOLOGI POLIGAMI -- When Remi Clignet published his book Many Wives, Many Powers [1], he was not alone in sharing the view that, in Africa, "co-wives may be perceived as direct and indirect sources of increased income and prestige."

In addition, African customary law was viewed as perhaps accommodating and hence beneficial to women, especially to those who would otherwise be 'unmarketable' in marriage.

By the 1970s, such arguments had become crystallized and popular. Polygyny in Africa had been on the research agenda for over two decades and could boast of such distinguished minds as M. Fortes (1949), Radcliffe-Brown (1950), John Beattie (1964), Ruth Finnegan (1967), and Jack and Esther Goody (1973).

Such was the strength of their canon on polygyny that African scholars who later wrote on the subject became almost their parrots or, in some cases, unnecessarily defensive. For example, John Mbiti stated in the introduction to his book, Akamba Stories [2] that "polygyny was, and is, an accepted and respectable institution, serving many useful purposes in society." G.K. Nukunya agreed that polygyny "earns prestige and respect" [3] although its economic basis may not be all that sacrosanct. And recently, Akosua Aidoo has reiterated the notion that "plurality of wives was a sign of affluence and power" [4] in African society.

However, the colonial missionary voice provided one consistent opposition to polygyny in Africa. It viewed the practice as unethical and destructive of family life. While it propagated this view with the full authority of the Bible (with justification sometimes difficult to provide from the Old Testament), missionaries were convinced that Africans had to be coerced into partaking in the vision of monogamy understood in Western culture. Unfortunately, both the missionary voice and the scholarly voice did not consider the views of African women on the matter as important. Although there was some awareness that women regarded polygyny as both a curse and a blessing, it was the distanced, albeit 'scientific,' perspective of the observer which predominated in both the pulpit and scholarly writings.

Contemporary research in the social sciences and humanities, is gradually centering the study of the culture of the protagonist's voice and recognizing that the views and experiences of those who take part in a given reality ought to receive close examination. This privileging seems appropriate, particularly given that women in Africa have often used literary productions to comment on marriage, family, gender relations and how the social arrangements of other institutions affect them. Story-telling, song, dance, poetry and ritual have often been used to express issues of major concern to women. In these contexts, women bare their hidden thoughts in an open determination to confront important social issues.

Moreover, as a general rule, literature or performance in African society is considered an institution of critical thought, in which ideas, reflections, values, and convictions provide core images of a society's sense of itself and its existential problems. [5] Simultaneously, literature is also seen as a statutory interpreter of life. Art forms in Africa actively engage their audiences in formulating, analyzing, and defining points of view on social reality. Since both the creators and consumers are simultaneously involved in thought and interpretation in the situation of performance, one must recognize the significance of an endemic voice that is unique and validates the performance. Such a voice (and its representativeness) is what one observes in African women's response to polygyny in their literary productions.

In the folktale tradition, for example, women have built a wide range of tales around themes which deal with domestic tension. Examples abound: boy loses mother, father remarries and new wife discriminates and torments boy; ghost of boy's mother intervenes and kills present wife and all her children from the marriage. Similarly, two co-wives share the same kitchen and the same hearth-stone. One has a child, the other none. The barren and apparently jealous wife changes the child of her co-wife into a fish and cooks it, which is then offered and eaten by the child's own mother on her return from a journey. [6] Then there is also the tale of two co-wives who begin a quarrel, first started by the elder wife. The quarrel ends in the death of the elder wife's own child. [7] And finally, there is the case of a poor man who eventually becomes the chief of a village as a result of the special talents, sacrifices and contributions of each of his four wives. Each of these sacrifices is seen as an expression of true love for the man.

In the end, there is the dilemma of whose child should succeed the chief. [8] These broad themes constitute almost a special genre in the African folktale tradition beloved by women story-tellers. While children also indulge in the telling of these tales, it is the recognized domain of women narrators who appropriate it to dramatize women's plight in polygyny. In these tales, as briefly indicated above, violence assumes an existential autonomy. Conflict, tension, deliberate cruelty and death become symbols of polygyny. The question then arises as to why women enact polygyny (and its domesticity) in the imagery of dehumanizing violence.

Source

No comments

Powered by Blogger.